So what has changed? The first development was the shift from college being necessary for some of our workforce to it being the avowed goal for most of our workforce. I won’t argue about whether this is a reasonable goal, just that it is the de facto goal for most high schools. That shift meant we are no longer educating students who are already equipped with both learning skills and motivation. Now we were/are being asked to educate students who may be underprepared for college and not motivated for its rigors.
The second development followed that increase in scope. Educating a dramatically wider population is shifting our focus from how higher education traditionally measured itself—faculty credentials, books in the library, research grants, etc.—to how prepared our graduates are for the 21st century workforce. To understand how profound this shift is I must turn to an example.
Those of you who are my age (baby boomers) remember what it was like to shop for something before the Internet. We had to trust sales people. There was very little comparative information (except for Consumer Reports). Pricing was a mystery. Compare that experience to now. You can enter your desired product into a search field and immediately find websites that offer the product, compare it to its peers, and offer prices for both new and used versions. The buyer now has all the power. When I was young, it was the seller who had the power, although those sellers had huge problems introducing their products to the public.
Another huge change is the ability for consumers to drive product demand and offerings. Via the Internet, consumers now freely post reviews, like/dislikes, suggestions and requests for new products and services.
When I went to school, institutional reputation was determined by how exclusive a college was. The fewer students it accepted from its applicant pool, the better it was. Now, Internet resources permit consumers to ask much deeper questions about institutions, to compare them across more dimensions, to see what students think about their faculty, and finally, to compare prices. These emerging capabilities, when viewed through the larger educational mission of higher education, spell change. Our customers are now able to ask deep questions about our results. How many students do we graduate? What sorts of jobs do they get? How much do they earn? Can they repay their student loans? Will you offer an online master's degree? Can I earn a credential in logistics, energy or education?
These questions signal a shift in power from the sellers—higher education institutions—to the buyers—students. We saw this happen in every major industry as technology forced established companies to re-invent themselves (e.g. IBM, American Express, McDonald's) or be replaced (Kodak).
In my next posting I will talk about some of the concrete actions higher education and Charter Oak are taking to adapt to this shift. To help me address those actions, please share with me the most important factors to you when decided what college to attend. What questions did you ask?